Liminality

AI & MLPhilosophySociety

Hotz reflects on the psychological and existential weight of living through the AI transition, framing it through Fullmetal Alchemist's philosopher's stone and homunculi as a metaphor for LLMs built from human-generated content. He argues the real problem with AI isn't hype but a specific demoralization: current AI isn't better than you, but the next version will be, and you can feel it approaching. This liminal moment — not quite arrived, not quite pre-AI — is the defining discomfort. He concludes with a meditation on control: nobody is in control, the 'conspiracy' is that there's no one steering, and the best we can do is stay honest and stop pretending otherwise.

We are psychologically stuck in a liminal AI moment — demoralized not by what AI is now but by the approaching certainty of what it will be — and the only honest response is accepting that no one, including AI lab insiders, is actually in control.
  • 7

    The homunculus is a puree of the souls that were used to create it.

  • 8

    It demoralizes you without being better than you – not because the current AI is good, but because the next one will be so much better.

  • 6

    1e25, 1e26, 1e27…is it just this simple? I don't know, and you don't either.

  • 9

    Do you want to get a job at a frontier AI lab, or do you want to blow up a datacenter? Either way, you are not in control, but you might fool yourself with the illusion.

  • 9

    The real conspiracy is not that there's lizard people in a basement controlling everything, it's that there aren't.

  • 7

    We are all riding on the same bus through the optimization landscape of reality. Shouting at the driver to no avail.

  • 7

    We don't get to control the territory, but we do get to draw the map. The only knob we get is how shitty we want to make it.

  • 6

    It's all just vibes like how deep learning is vibes.

reflective, melancholic, philosophical